Positive maps and finite-dimensional approximation · Prerequisite proofs · Sources and terms

Faithful-state expectations from full bounded-graph modular data

Original exposition and diagram by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, October 2026. CC0-1.0 to the extent of rights held. Credited human sources retain their own rights.

Let MM have a faithful normal state φ\varphi, and let B⊂MB\subset M be a von Neumann subalgebra with the same identity. If BB is invariant under the modular group of φ\varphi, we construct its normal φ\varphi-preserving expectation by compressing the faithful-state GNS representation. The central step identifies the entire smaller Tomita graph. Gaussian filters make that identification without assuming a general weight expectation or a KMS uniqueness theorem.

The proof applies to arbitrary Hilbert spaces and nonseparable algebras. It concerns faithful normal states; no assertion about infinite values of a general weight is used. If M=0M=0, the unique map and both GNS spaces are zero and all conclusions have their zero-space meanings. Below M≠0M\ne0.

The exact inputs are BG1–BG6 for the full left-Hilbert-algebra modular graphs, commutant theorem and modular normalization, normal GNS representations, bounded/unbounded spectral calculus, the scalar Gaussian Fourier identity, normal vector pairings and the complete predual, and the increasing-net normality criterion. The general modular input BG is constructed from the freely accessible bounded-operator proof of Rieffel and Van Daele, cited below.

SE1. The state GNS algebra and its centralizer

Work in the faithful normal GNS representation (H,M,Ω)(H,M,\Omega), with inner products linear in the first variable:

⟨aΩ,bΩ⟩=φ(b∗a),∥Ω∥=1.\langle a\Omega,b\Omega\rangle=\varphi(b^*a),\qquad \|\Omega\|=1.

The faithful normal GNS representation and its von Neumann image are the stated FF input. The vector Ω\Omega is cyclic and separating. Its commutant orbit is also dense: the projection onto M′Ω‾\overline{M'\Omega} commutes with M′M', hence belongs to MM; it fixes Ω\Omega, so separation forces it to be 11.

The algebra A=MΩ\mathcal A=M\Omega, with multiplication (aΩ)(bΩ)=abΩ(a\Omega)(b\Omega)=ab\Omega and (aΩ)#=a∗Ω(a\Omega)^\#=a^*\Omega, is a left Hilbert algebra. Left multiplication is bounded by ∥a∥\|a\|, adjoints give the Hilbert-algebra identity, and A2=A\mathcal A^2=\mathcal A because 1∈M1\in M. To check closability, suppose anΩ→0a_n\Omega\to0 and an∗Ω→ηa_n^*\Omega\to\eta. For c∈M′c\in M',

⟨an∗Ω,cΩ⟩=⟨Ω,ancΩ⟩=⟨Ω,canΩ⟩⟶0.\langle a_n^*\Omega,c\Omega\rangle =\langle\Omega,a_n c\Omega\rangle =\langle\Omega,c a_n\Omega\rangle\longrightarrow0.

Density of M′ΩM'\Omega gives η=0\eta=0. This sequence criterion proves closability in the Hilbert-space graph metric and imposes no separability assumption.

Write S=#‾S=\overline{\#}, F=S∗F=S^*. BG gives, on their full spectral domains,

S=JΔ1/2,F=JΔ−1/2,JMJ=M′,Ut=Δit,UtMU−t=M.(SE1)S=J\Delta^{1/2},\qquad F=J\Delta^{-1/2},\qquad JMJ=M',\qquad U_t=\Delta^{it},\qquad U_tMU_{-t}=M. \tag{SE1}

Here Δ\Delta is positive, injective and self-adjoint, and JJ is an antiunitary involution. Since SΩ=ΩS\Omega=\Omega, and ⟨S(aΩ),Ω⟩=⟨Ω,aΩ⟩\langle S(a\Omega),\Omega\rangle=\langle\Omega,a\Omega\rangle on the graph core, the definition of the closed antilinear adjoint gives FΩ=ΩF\Omega=\Omega. Thus ΔΩ=Ω\Delta\Omega=\Omega, UtΩ=ΩU_t\Omega=\Omega, and JΩ=ΩJ\Omega=\Omega. Put

αt(a)=UtaU−t.\alpha_t(a)=U_taU_{-t}.

Then UtaΩ=αt(a)ΩU_ta\Omega=\alpha_t(a)\Omega and φαt=φ\varphi\alpha_t=\varphi. This is the state modular group supplied by BG.

We also verify its exact fixed algebra. Define

Mφ={a:φ(ax)=φ(xa) for every x∈M}.M_\varphi=\{a:\varphi(ax)=\varphi(xa)\text{ for every }x\in M\}.

This set is closed under adjoints, by conjugating its pairings. If a∈Mφa\in M_\varphi, then for every b∈Mb\in M, ⟨S(bΩ),aΩ⟩=φ(a∗b∗)=φ(b∗a∗)=⟨a∗Ω,bΩ⟩\langle S(b\Omega),a\Omega\rangle =\varphi(a^*b^*)=\varphi(b^*a^*) =\langle a^*\Omega,b\Omega\rangle. The graph-core adjoint test gives F(aΩ)=a∗ΩF(a\Omega)=a^*\Omega. Applying it to a∗a^* shows Δ(aΩ)=aΩ\Delta(a\Omega)=a\Omega, hence αt(a)=a\alpha_t(a)=a by separation.

Conversely, if αt(a)=a\alpha_t(a)=a for all tt, both aΩa\Omega and a∗Ωa^*\Omega are fixed by every UtU_t. The spectral measure of each is supported at λ=1\lambda=1: use the countable family λit\lambda^{it}, t∈Qt\in\mathbb Q, whose common fixed set in (0,∞)(0,\infty) is {1}\{1\}. Thus (SE1) gives J(aΩ)=a∗ΩJ(a\Omega)=a^*\Omega and F(aΩ)=a∗ΩF(a\Omega)=a^*\Omega. The same core pairing now gives φ(a∗b∗)=φ(b∗a∗)\varphi(a^*b^*)=\varphi(b^*a^*) for every bb. Conjugation proves a∈Mφa\in M_\varphi. Therefore

Mφ=Mα.(SE2)M_\varphi=M^\alpha. \tag{SE2}

SE2. Gaussian filters stay inside the invariant subalgebra

Assume αt(B)=B\alpha_t(B)=B for every real tt, and put HB=BΩ‾H_B=\overline{B\Omega}, with orthogonal projection qq. Both BB and B∗B^* preserve HBH_B, so qq commutes with BB. The equality UtBΩ=BΩU_tB\Omega=B\Omega shows that qq commutes with every UtU_t, hence with the spectral projections of Δ\Delta and all of its spectral functions on their full domains.

For integers n≥1n\ge1, real rr, and λ>0\lambda>0, define

kn(t)=n/π e−nt2,fn(λ)=e−(log⁡λ)2/(4n).(SE3)k_n(t)=\sqrt{n/\pi}\,e^{-nt^2},\qquad f_n(\lambda)=e^{-(\log\lambda)^2/(4n)}. \tag{SE3}

The scalar Gaussian Fourier identity, with the indicated sign convention, gives

∫Rkn(t+ir)λit dt=enr2e−(log⁡λ−2nr)2/(4n)=λrfn(λ).(SE4)\int_{\mathbb R} k_n(t+ir)\lambda^{it}\,dt =e^{nr^2}e^{-(\log\lambda-2nr)^2/(4n)} =\lambda^r f_n(\lambda). \tag{SE4}

Indeed kn(t+ir)=enr2kn(t)e−2inrtk_n(t+ir)=e^{nr^2}k_n(t)e^{-2inrt}, so this follows by the real Gaussian transform. Both sides define a bounded spectral multiplier, of norm at most enr2e^{nr^2}, and the kernel has L1L^1-norm enr2e^{nr^2}.

For b∈Bb\in B, let

bn,r=∫Rkn(t+ir)αt(b) dt.(SE5)b_{n,r}=\int_{\mathbb R}k_n(t+ir)\alpha_t(b)\,dt. \tag{SE5}

This is a bounded ultraweak integral, not an assumed complex-time value of α(b)\alpha(b). To construct it, pair the integrand with each normal functional. The resulting scalar integral is a bounded linear functional on M∗M_*, of norm at most enr2∥b∥e^{nr^2}\|b\|, hence defines an element of M=(M∗)∗M=(M_*)^*. Every normal functional vanishing on the ultraweakly closed subspace BB vanishes on that element, so bn,r∈Bb_{n,r}\in B.

On HH, the vector orbit UtbΩU_tb\Omega is norm continuous. Its kernel integral exists by completion from integrable simple vector functions; its range is contained in the separable closed span of this one continuous orbit even if HH is nonseparable. Pairing against aΩa\Omega, then using density, identifies the ultraweak integral vector with this Hilbert integral. Spectral integration of (SE4), justified by the L1L^1 bound, therefore gives

bn,rΩ=Δrfn(Δ)bΩ.(SE6)b_{n,r}\Omega=\Delta^r f_n(\Delta)b\Omega. \tag{SE6}

In particular fn(Δ)bΩ∈BΩf_n(\Delta)b\Omega\in B\Omega, and the bounded multiplier Δ−1/2fn(Δ)\Delta^{-1/2}f_n(\Delta) also sends BΩB\Omega into BΩB\Omega.

SE3. The smaller algebra has the entire restricted graph

For b∈Bb\in B put h=Δ−1/2fn(Δ)bΩ=bn,−1/2Ωh=\Delta^{-1/2}f_n(\Delta)b\Omega=b_{n,-1/2}\Omega. It is in BΩB\Omega and in D(Δ1/2)D(\Delta^{1/2}). Thus

Jfn(Δ)bΩ=Sh=bn,−1/2∗Ω∈HB.Jf_n(\Delta)b\Omega =S h=b_{n,-1/2}^*\Omega\in H_B.

Since 0<fn≤10<f_n\le1 and fn(λ)→1f_n(\lambda)\to1 for λ>0\lambda>0, spectral dominated convergence gives fn(Δ)→1f_n(\Delta)\to1 strongly. Consequently J(BΩ)⊂HBJ(B\Omega)\subset H_B, and continuity gives JHB⊂HBJH_B\subset H_B. The involution J2=1J^2=1 gives equality. Antiunitarity also preserves its orthogonal complement, so qJ=JqqJ=Jq.

Let SB=bΩ↦b∗Ω‾S_B=\overline{b\Omega\mapsto b^*\Omega} on HBH_B. Its initial graph is contained in the closed graph of SS, so

SB⊂S∣HB∩D(S).S_B\subset S|_{H_B\cap D(S)}.

For the reverse inclusion, fix ξ∈HB∩D(S)\xi\in H_B\cap D(S), and approximate ξ\xi in Hilbert norm by bjΩb_j\Omega, bj∈Bb_j\in B. For fixed nn, both fn(Δ)f_n(\Delta) and Δ1/2fn(Δ)\Delta^{1/2}f_n(\Delta) are bounded. Hence

fn(Δ)bjΩ⟶fn(Δ)ξ,Sfn(Δ)bjΩ⟶JΔ1/2fn(Δ)ξ.f_n(\Delta)b_j\Omega\longrightarrow f_n(\Delta)\xi,\qquad S f_n(\Delta)b_j\Omega \longrightarrow J\Delta^{1/2}f_n(\Delta)\xi.

The approximating vectors belong to BΩB\Omega by (SE6). Closedness of SBS_B gives fn(Δ)ξ∈D(SB)f_n(\Delta)\xi\in D(S_B), with the displayed value of SBS_B. Finally fn(Δ)ξ→ξf_n(\Delta)\xi\to\xi and Δ1/2fn(Δ)ξ→Δ1/2ξ\Delta^{1/2}f_n(\Delta)\xi\to\Delta^{1/2}\xi by dominated convergence against the finite graph spectral measure of ξ\xi. Another use of closedness proves

D(SB)=HB∩D(S),SB=S∣HB.(SE7)D(S_B)=H_B\cap D(S),\qquad S_B=S|_{H_B}. \tag{SE7}

The algebra BΩB\Omega is a left Hilbert algebra by the same identities as in SE1; closability follows already from its containment in the graph of SS. Apply BG to this algebra. Since qq reduces JJ and Δ\Delta, the restriction J∣HBJ|_{H_B} times the positive operator Δ1/2∣HB\Delta^{1/2}|_{H_B} is the polar decomposition of the whole operator in (SE7). Uniqueness gives

JB=J∣HB,ΔB=Δ∣HB.(SE8)J_B=J|_{H_B},\qquad \Delta_B=\Delta|_{H_B}. \tag{SE8}

The adjoint domain is also the full restriction: D(SB∗)=HB∩D(S∗)D(S_B^*)=H_B\cap D(S^*). One can check this directly using the orthogonal graph decomposition S=S∣HB⊕S∣HB⊥S=S|_{H_B}\oplus S|_{H_B^\perp}: the adjoint pairing on the first summand extends to the whole domain by giving value zero on the second, and the converse is restriction of the same pairing. No equality merely on algebra vectors is substituted for these closed-domain statements.

SE4. Compression is an element of the smaller algebra

Write πB(b)=b∣HB\pi_B(b)=b|_{H_B}. This is the faithful normal GNS representation of BB for φ∣B\varphi|_B, with von Neumann image πB(B)\pi_B(B), by the normal GNS input. It is faithful because bΩ=0b\Omega=0 implies b=0b=0.

For x∈Mx\in M, consider the bounded operator qxq∣HBq x q|_{H_B}. For b∈Bb\in B, the operator JbJJbJ belongs to M′M', while qq commutes with it because qq commutes with JJ and BB. Therefore the compression commutes with

qJbJq∣HB=JBπB(b)JB.qJbJq|_{H_B}=J_B\pi_B(b)J_B.

BG for BΩB\Omega identifies these operators as the commutant πB(B)′\pi_B(B)'. The bicommutant identity now puts qxq∣HBq x q|_{H_B} in πB(B)\pi_B(B). Define its unique preimage by

πB(EB(x))=qxq∣HB,EB(x)∈B.(SE9)\pi_B(E_B(x))=q x q|_{H_B},\qquad E_B(x)\in B. \tag{SE9}

This proves existence inside the actual smaller algebra; compression is not simply declared to have that range.

Faithful star representations reflect positivity, including at every matrix size. For completeness, if a self-adjoint matrix cc had negative spectrum, a nonzero continuous function of cc supported in the negative half-line would have zero image in a positive representation. Continuous functional calculus and faithfulness give a contradiction. Matrix faithfulness follows entrywise. Thus the positive compression at every matrix size proves that EBE_B is completely positive.

The same faithful representation is isometric. For b≠0b\ne0, the norm equality can also be seen from the nonzero spectral projection of ∣b∣|b| above any 0<c<∥b∥0<c<\|b\|: faithfulness gives a nonzero vector pΩp\Omega and ∥bpΩ∥≥c∥pΩ∥\|bp\Omega\|\ge c\|p\Omega\|; the case b=0b=0 is immediate. Hence ∥EB(x)∥=∥qxq∣HB∥≤∥x∥\|E_B(x)\|=\|q x q|_{H_B}\|\le\|x\|. The defining formula also proves complex linearity, EB(1)=1E_B(1)=1, EB∣B=1BE_B|_B=1_B, and bimodularity, since qq commutes with BB. Because qΩ=Ωq\Omega=\Omega,

EB(x)Ω=qxΩ,φ(EB(x))=φ(x).(SE10)E_B(x)\Omega=q x\Omega,\qquad \varphi(E_B(x))=\varphi(x). \tag{SE10}

Faithfulness on positive elements follows from the faithfulness of φ\varphi.

SE5. All-net normality and uniqueness

If 0≤xi↑x0\le x_i\uparrow x is any bounded increasing net in MM, the positive elements EB(xi)E_B(x_i) increase and are bounded by ∥x∥1\|x\|1. Let yy be their supremum in BB. Normality of the two GNS representations and strong convergence of bounded increasing operator nets give

πB(y)=sup⁡iqxiq∣HB=qxq∣HB=πB(EB(x)).\pi_B(y)=\sup_i qx_iq|_{H_B}=qxq|_{H_B} =\pi_B(E_B(x)).

Faithfulness gives y=EB(x)y=E_B(x). NF6 now gives full ultraweak normality. This is an increasing-net proof and does not assume a uniform operator-norm bound for arbitrary ultraweakly convergent nets.

If T:M→BT:M\to B is another φ\varphi-preserving conditional expectation, bimodularity gives

φ(b∗T(x))=φ(T(b∗x))=φ(b∗x)(b∈B).\varphi(b^*T(x))=\varphi(T(b^*x))=\varphi(b^*x) \qquad(b\in B).

Thus T(x)Ω−qxΩT(x)\Omega-qx\Omega is a vector in HBH_B orthogonal to the dense subspace BΩB\Omega, so is zero. Faithfulness proves T=EBT=E_B. Finally qq commutes with UtU_t, and (SE9) gives EBαt=αtEBE_B\alpha_t=\alpha_t E_B.

We have proved the precise faithful-state contract: every unital modular invariant BB has a unique normal, faithful, completely positive, φ\varphi-preserving conditional expectation, with its exact GNS projection and whole restricted Tomita graphs. In particular, if N⊂MφN\subset M_\varphi, then NN, N′∩MN'\cap M, and N∨(N′∩M)N\vee(N'\cap M) are modular invariant: SE1 fixes NN pointwise; applying αt\alpha_t to commutation with its fixed elements preserves N′∩MN'\cap M; then it preserves the generated join. The state pinching formulas can therefore use all three expectations at this full scope.

Gaussian vectors identify the full smaller graph and force compression to belong to the smaller algebra.

Figure 1. Every arrow refers to an entire operator or closed domain. In SE2, the real-parameter integral bn,rb_{n,r} gives Δrfn(Δ)bΩ∈BΩ\Delta^r f_n(\Delta)b\Omega\in B\Omega; r=−1/2r=-1/2 supplies the JJ-invariance step. The two graph limits in SE3 identify SBS_B and its adjoint on full domains. SE4 then uses the commutant to put the compression in πB(B)\pi_B(B); SE5 proves normality and uniqueness.

Human proof source and scope

Marc A. Rieffel and Alfons Van Daele, A bounded operator approach to Tomita–Takesaki theory, Pacific Journal of Mathematics 69 (1977), 187–221. The paper's §§4–5 and appendix prove the underlying modular data and commutant theorem. The local BG1–6 construction supplies their entire general left-Hilbert-algebra route, including its explicit bounded-coercivity repair. The Gaussian invariant-subspace, full graph-core and expectation compression arguments are supplied above; no expectation proof is imported from a book mentioned in that paper's bibliography.