Open MathsAll courses
Positive maps and finite-dimensional approximation · Prerequisite proofs · Sources and terms

Balanced weights: complete graph and cocycle identities

CC0-1.0 to the extent of programme rights held. Separate human-source rights remain unchanged.

Let φ1,…,φk\varphi_1,\ldots,\varphi_k, 1≤k<∞1\leq k<\infty, be faithful normal semifinite weights on the same arbitrary von Neumann algebra MM. No countability assumption is made. We construct their balanced weight on Mk(M)M_k(M), prove the complete finite-ideal and closed-involution domains, and derive its corner modular groups and canonical off-diagonal unitary cocycles. The chain identity uses k=3k=3. This construction does not assert that every abstract cocycle comes from a weight.

Actual earlier written proofs are OA-FLOW.GW.1, OA-FLOW.GW.2, OA-FLOW.GW.3, OA-FLOW.GW.4, OA-FLOW.GW.5, OA-FLOW.NF.5, OA-FLOW.WR.3, OA-FLOW.WR.4, OA-FLOW.WR.5, OA-FLOW.MW.4, OA-FLOW.CI.1, OA-FLOW.CI.2, OA-FLOW.CI.3, OA-FLOW.SF.SF0, OA-FLOW.SF.SB0, OA-FLOW.SF.SB1, OA-FLOW.SF.SB2, OA-FLOW.SF.SB3, OA-FLOW.SF.SB4, OA-FLOW.SF.SB5, OA-FLOW.SF.SB6, OA-FLOW.SF.SF1, OA-FLOW.CP.1, OA-FLOW.CP.2, OA-FLOW.CP.3, OA-FLOW.CP.4, OA-FLOW.CP.5, OA-FLOW.CP.6. These bind the finite ideals, GNS normality, full finite-star involution/recovery, arbitrary faithful-weight modular group, full closed graph and polar domains, spectral reductions, and concrete vector-series topologies. No normal-weight sum theorem or arbitrary-cocycle realization theorem is an input.

The free primary context for the balanced matrix method is Hiai's author notes, Lemmas 7.4–7.5 and Theorem 7.6, printed pp.65–67. The corner identifications, identical-weight normalization and isomorphism covariance below use complete GNS graph equalities. Relative-operator domain statements are derived from that full graph, not assumed from a block display. The original free primary construction and chain law are also in Connes, Lemmas1.2.2–1.2.3(a), printed pp.144–147. Only those balanced-matrix conclusions are used here; the separate arbitrary-cocycle realization theorem is not an input.

BC-1. The full balanced weight and every finite domain

Represent Mk(M)M_k(M) on the finite Hilbert sum KkK^k if M⊆B(K)M\subseteq B(K). Write EijE_{ij} for the scalar matrix units, pi=Eiip_i=E_{ii}, and xEijxE_{ij} for the matrix with sole entry xx at (i,j)(i,j). The matrix algebra is a von Neumann algebra: adjoints and products are entrywise finite formulas, and weak-operator closedness follows by testing each pair of coordinate vectors. Entrywise ultraweak convergence is equivalent to matrix ultraweak convergence, since a vector series expands into finitely many entrywise vector series, each with square-summable factors; the converse is compression to two coordinates.

For X≥0X\geq0, set

Θ(X)=∑j=1kφj(xjj).(BC1)\Theta(X)=\sum_{j=1}^k\varphi_j(x_{jj}). \tag{BC1}

The diagonal entries are positive, so this is an extended nonnegative number. Additivity and positive homogeneity follow entrywise, with 0⋅∞=00\cdot\infty=0. It is normal: for a bounded increasing net Xα↑XX_\alpha\uparrow X, each diagonal increases to the corresponding diagonal of XX, as follows from the strong supremum construction. Each φj\varphi_j preserves that supremum. A finite sum commutes with this increasing limit, including infinity; choose a common index above finitely many indices approximating the finite summands, or above an index making an infinite summand arbitrarily large.

Put Nj=nφjN_j=\mathfrak n_{\varphi_j}, mj=mφjm_j=\mathfrak m_{\varphi_j}, and Aj=Nj∩Nj∗A_j=N_j\cap N_j^*. Since

Θ(X∗X)=∑j=1k∑i=1kφj(xij∗xij),(BC2)\Theta(X^*X)=\sum_{j=1}^k\sum_{i=1}^k \varphi_j(x_{ij}^*x_{ij}), \tag{BC2}

the exact finite domains are

NΘ={X:xij∈Nj for all i,j},AΘ={X:xij∈Nj∩Ni∗ for all i,j},mΘ={X:xij∈span⁡(Ni∗Nj) for all i,j}.(BC3)\begin{aligned} N_\Theta&=\{X:x_{ij}\in N_j\text{ for all }i,j\},\\ A_\Theta&=\{X:x_{ij}\in N_j\cap N_i^*\text{ for all }i,j\},\\ m_\Theta&=\{X:x_{ij}\in\operatorname{span}(N_i^*N_j) \text{ for all }i,j\}. \end{aligned} \tag{BC3}

The first assertion is (BC2), and the second applies it to X∗X^*. For the third, GW gives mΘ=span⁡NΘ∗NΘm_\Theta=\operatorname{span}N_\Theta^*N_\Theta; each product has the stated entries. Conversely a matrix with sole entry y∗xy^*x at (i,j)(i,j), y∈Ni,x∈Njy\in N_i,x\in N_j, is the product (yEri)∗(xErj)(yE_{ri})^*(xE_{rj}) for any row rr. Finite sums give every stated matrix.

The weight is faithful: if Θ(X∗X)=0\Theta(X^*X)=0, (BC2) and faithfulness of every φj\varphi_j give every xij=0x_{ij}=0. This also proves faithfulness on arbitrary positive matrices by taking a bounded square root. For each jj, take GW's increasing finite positive contractions uαj(j)↑1u^{(j)}_{\alpha_j}\uparrow1. The diagonal matrices

Uα=diag⁡(uα1(1),…,uαk(k))U_\alpha=\operatorname{diag}(u^{(1)}_{\alpha_1},\ldots, u^{(k)}_{\alpha_k})

are finite positive contractions for Θ\Theta and increase to II, with the finite product directed set. GW's semifiniteness criterion proves that Θ\Theta is semifinite.

Its finite linear extension is

Θ0(X)=∑j(φj)0(xjj)(X∈mΘ).(BC4)\Theta_0(X)=\sum_j(\varphi_j)_0(x_{jj})\qquad(X\in m_\Theta). \tag{BC4}

Every diagonal belongs to mjm_j by (BC3). The displayed formula agrees with Θ\Theta on the finite positive cone, so the uniqueness in GW-2 proves the claim.

The exact GNS identification is

HΘ=⨁i,j=1kHj,ΛΘ(X)=(Λj(xij))i,j,(BC5)H_\Theta=\bigoplus_{i,j=1}^k H_j,\qquad \Lambda_\Theta(X)=(\Lambda_j(x_{ij}))_{i,j}, \tag{BC5}

where the (i,j)(i,j) component is a copy of Hj=HφjH_j=H_{\varphi_j}. Norm equality is (BC2), and density follows by independently approximating each of the finitely many Hilbert coordinates with an element of NjN_j. For B=(bir)B=(b_{ir}), the representation is

(πΘ(B)ξ)ij=∑r=1kπj(bir)ξrj.(BC6)(\pi_\Theta(B)\xi)_{ij} =\sum_{r=1}^k\pi_j(b_{ir})\xi_{rj}. \tag{BC6}

This follows first on the dense GNS range from multiplication, then everywhere by boundedness. The representation is faithful and normal by GW, NF and WR, as already incorporated in MW.

BC-2. Row and column graph projections, with full closed domains

Let Pi=πΘ(pi)P_i=\pi_\Theta(p_i), the projection onto row ii, and let RiR_i be the projection onto column ii in (BC5). Each RiR_i commutes with the representation in (BC6). Both projections preserve ΛΘ(AΘ)\Lambda_\Theta(A_\Theta), by the entrywise description in (BC3).

On this full initial finite-star domain, the involution S0S_0 transposes the matrix and takes adjoints of its entries. Consequently

S0Pi=RiS0,S0Ri=PiS0.(BC7)S_0P_i=R_iS_0,\qquad S_0R_i=P_iS_0. \tag{BC7}

WR proves that S0S_0 is closable and its closure SS has this domain as a graph core. Approximating a vector in D(S)D(S) by core vectors in graph norm, boundedness of Pi,RiP_i,R_i and (BC7) give

PiD(S),RiD(S)⊆D(S),SPi=RiS,SRi=PiS on D(S).(BC8)P_iD(S),R_iD(S)\subseteq D(S),\qquad SP_i=R_iS,\quad SR_i=P_iS \text{ on }D(S). \tag{BC8}

No domain equality is inferred from a merely formal block equation.

The adjoint identities have the full domains as well. For η∈D(S∗)\eta\in D(S^*) and ξ∈D(S)\xi\in D(S), the definition of the conjugate-linear adjoint and (BC8) give

⟨Sξ,Riη⟩=⟨RiSξ,η⟩=⟨SPiξ,η⟩=⟨PiS∗η,ξ⟩.\langle S\xi,R_i\eta\rangle =\langle R_iS\xi,\eta\rangle =\langle SP_i\xi,\eta\rangle =\langle P_iS^*\eta,\xi\rangle.

Thus Riη∈D(S∗)R_i\eta\in D(S^*) and S∗Riη=PiS∗ηS^*R_i\eta=P_iS^*\eta. Interchanging Pi,RiP_i,R_i gives

S∗Ri=PiS∗,S∗Pi=RiS∗ on D(S∗).(BC9)S^*R_i=P_iS^*,\qquad S^*P_i=R_iS^* \text{ on }D(S^*). \tag{BC9}

For Δ=S∗S\Delta=S^*S, (BC8)–(BC9) imply that PiP_i and RiR_i preserve D(Δ)D(\Delta) and commute there with Δ\Delta. For example, if ξ∈D(Δ)\xi\in D(\Delta), then Sξ∈D(S∗)S\xi\in D(S^*), so SPiξ=RiSξ∈D(S∗)SP_i\xi=R_iS\xi\in D(S^*), and ΔPiξ=PiΔξ\Delta P_i\xi=P_i\Delta\xi. The same holds for the complementary projections. The resolvent, and hence the actual spectral calculus, therefore commutes with every Pi,RiP_i,R_i. In particular

ΔitPi=PiΔit,ΔitRi=RiΔit.(BC10)\Delta^{it}P_i=P_i\Delta^{it},\qquad \Delta^{it}R_i=R_i\Delta^{it}. \tag{BC10}

MW's faithful implementation now proves σtΘ(pi)=pi\sigma_t^\Theta(p_i)=p_i.

For precision, these projections also establish the exact relative closed operators. The coordinate projection Cij=PiRjC_{ij}=P_iR_j satisfies SCij=CjiSSC_{ij}=C_{ji}S, with domain preservation. Core approximation followed by CijC_{ij} shows that the part of SS from coordinate (i,j)(i,j) to coordinate (j,i)(j,i) is exactly the closure of

Λj(x)⟼Λi(x∗),x∈Nj∩Ni∗.(BC11)\Lambda_j(x)\longmapsto\Lambda_i(x^*), \qquad x\in N_j\cap N_i^*. \tag{BC11}

Its domain is dense in HjH_j: project the dense initial domain ΛΘ(AΘ)\Lambda_\Theta(A_\Theta) onto this coordinate. It is closed by (BC8), and its graph is approximated by (BC11). Its inverse is the opposite coordinate part, since S2=1S^2=1 with its exact domain from CI.

Denote this closed anti-linear operator by Si,j:Hj⊃D(Si,j)→HiS_{i,j}:H_j\supset D(S_{i,j})\to H_i, and the part of Δ\Delta on coordinate (i,j)(i,j) by Δi,j\Delta_{i,j}. Since this coordinate reduces Δ\Delta, the polar relation on it is

Si,j=Ji,jΔi,j1/2,(BC12)S_{i,j}=J_{i,j}\Delta_{i,j}^{1/2}, \tag{BC12}

where Ji,jJ_{i,j} is the restriction of the full JJ to those two coordinates. It is an antiunitary onto HiH_i: from S=JΔ1/2S=J\Delta^{1/2}, the dense range of the injective positive square root on the coordinate, and SCij=CjiSSC_{ij}=C_{ji}S, first obtain that JJ maps the (i,j)(i,j) coordinate into (j,i)(j,i); apply J2=1J^2=1 for equality. All powers of Δi,j\Delta_{i,j} have the restricted spectral domains. In particular Si,i=SφiS_{i,i}=S_{\varphi_i} and Δi,i=Δφi\Delta_{i,i}=\Delta_{\varphi_i}, because (BC11) on the diagonal is precisely its whole original finite-star graph.

BC-3. Every finite corner has its own recovered modular group

Let I⊆{1,…,k}I\subseteq\{1,\ldots,k\} be nonempty, and pI=∑i∈Ipip_I=\sum_{i\in I}p_i. Equation (BC10) fixes this projection, so σtΘ\sigma_t^\Theta restricts to a pointwise ultraweakly continuous normal automorphism group of pIMk(M)pIp_I M_k(M)p_I.

Identify that corner with M∣I∣(M)M_{|I|}(M). The restriction of Θ\Theta is exactly the balanced weight ΘI\Theta_I of the weights indexed by II, including every infinite value. It is faithful normal semifinite by BC-1. Its finite-star algebra is exactly the corner of (BC3), with zeros outside I×II\times I. Let PI=∑i∈IPiP_I=\sum_{i\in I}P_i, RI=∑i∈IRiR_I=\sum_{i\in I}R_i, and QI=PIRIQ_I=P_IR_I. Thus QIQ_I keeps exactly the coordinates indexed by I×II\times I in the full Hilbert sum (BC5). The projections commute. Equations (BC8)–(BC9), applied to their finite sums and products, give

QID(S)⊆D(S),SQI=QIS,QID(S∗)⊆D(S∗),S∗QI=QIS∗.(BC-GRAPH1) Q_ID(S)\subseteq D(S),\quad SQ_I=Q_IS, \qquad Q_ID(S^*)\subseteq D(S^*),\quad S^*Q_I=Q_IS^*. \tag{BC-GRAPH1}

In particular QIQ_I reduces Δ=S∗S\Delta=S^*S, its resolvent and all its spectral powers, with the exact restricted domains supplied in BC-2.

The zero-extension map identifies the complete GNS space of ΘI\Theta_I isometrically with QIHΘQ_IH_\Theta: (BC2) gives norm equality and (BC5) gives density in every retained coordinate. It intertwines the corner representation by (BC6). The entire finite-star domain for ΘI\Theta_I is exactly QIΛΘ(AΘ)Q_I\Lambda_\Theta(A_\Theta), by (BC3). Transposition and adjoints on that domain give its initial involution. Since this domain is a graph core for the closed part of SS, its closure is precisely that part: project any approximating whole-core net by QIQ_I, using (BC-GRAPH1), and conversely embed every corner-core graph pair in the whole graph. The same domain argument for the adjoint, or the orthogonal sum with 1−QI1-Q_I, gives the full adjoint part. Consequently

SΘI=S∣QIHΘ,ΔΘI=Δ∣QIHΘ,ΔΘIit=Δit∣QIHΘ.(BC-GRAPH2) S_{\Theta_I}=S|_{Q_IH_\Theta},\qquad \Delta_{\Theta_I}=\Delta|_{Q_IH_\Theta},\qquad \Delta_{\Theta_I}^{it}=\Delta^{it}|_{Q_IH_\Theta}. \tag{BC-GRAPH2}

These are unitary identifications of closed operators with their domains. For x∈pIMk(M)pIx\in p_IM_k(M)p_I, the implementation of σtΘ(x)\sigma_t^\Theta(x) restricted to QIHΘQ_IH_\Theta is therefore the implementation of σtΘI(x)\sigma_t^{\Theta_I}(x) in its full GNS representation. The ambient action fixes pIp_I, and that corner representation is faithful. Equality of these represented elements proves

σtΘ∣pIMk(M)pI=σtΘI.(BC13)\sigma_t^\Theta|_{p_I M_k(M)p_I}=\sigma_t^{\Theta_I}. \tag{BC13}

This proves independence from the ambient balanced matrix size. In a one-entry corner it becomes

σtΘ(xEii)=σtφi(x)Eii.(BC14)\sigma_t^\Theta(xE_{ii})=\sigma_t^{\varphi_i}(x)E_{ii}. \tag{BC14}

The statement does not require that the projection pIp_I itself have finite weight.

Rows and columns of a three-by-three balanced GNS space: the square coordinate projection reduces the complete involution and modular operator

The diagram uses k=3k=3 and I={1,3}I=\{1,3\} to display the coordinate maps. A cell (i,j)(i,j) is a full copy of HjH_j, rather than a one-dimensional matrix entry. On the initial graph, Λj(x)\Lambda_j(x) in that cell is sent to Λi(x∗)\Lambda_i(x^*) in cell (j,i)(j,i), for x∈Nj∩Ni∗x\in N_j\cap N_i^*. Projection onto the green I×II\times I cells commutes with this transposition on the complete closed domains by (BC-GRAPH1). Equations (BC-GRAPH1)–2 are proved for every finite kk and every nonempty II; no finite value of Θ(pI)\Theta(p_I) is assumed. The SVG is the editable figure source.

For each i,ji,j, fixed support projections give a unique linear map βti,j:M→M\beta_t^{i,j}:M\to M such that

σtΘ(xEij)=βti,j(x)Eij.(BC15)\sigma_t^\Theta(xE_{ij})=\beta_t^{i,j}(x)E_{ij}. \tag{BC15}

It is a surjective isometry, since a single-entry matrix has norm ∥x∥\|x\| and the inverse map is obtained at −t-t. It is pointwise strongly* continuous and ultraweakly continuous; matrix entries preserve those topologies, and MW supplies them for the ambient group. The group and adjoint laws are

βs+ti,j=βsi,jβti,j,βtj,i(x∗)=βti,j(x)∗.(BC16)\beta_{s+t}^{i,j}=\beta_s^{i,j}\beta_t^{i,j},\qquad \beta_t^{j,i}(x^*)=\beta_t^{i,j}(x)^*. \tag{BC16}

For each column ℓ\ell, implementation in (BC5) and (BC10) gives the whole-Hilbert operator identity

πℓ(βti,j(x))=Δi,ℓitπℓ(x)Δj,ℓ−it.(BC17)\pi_\ell(\beta_t^{i,j}(x)) =\Delta_{i,\ell}^{it}\pi_\ell(x)\Delta_{j,\ell}^{-it}. \tag{BC17}

All three operators here are bounded; the imaginary powers act on the full copy of HℓH_\ell. It follows by applying both sides of the implemented matrix equation to coordinate (j,ℓ)(j,\ell). Thus (BC17) does not suppress an unbounded intermediate product domain.

BC-4. Canonical unitary cocycles and the chain law

For two weights φ,ψ\varphi,\psi, place them at indices 1,21,2, respectively, and define

(Dψ:Dφ)t=ut,σtΘ(φ,ψ)(E21)=utE21.(BC18)(D\psi:D\varphi)_t=u_t,\qquad \sigma_t^{\Theta(\varphi,\psi)}(E_{21})=u_tE_{21}. \tag{BC18}

This is a definition through the already constructed balanced modular group; it does not presuppose any Radon–Nikodym theorem. Since E21∗E21=p1E_{21}^*E_{21}=p_1, E21E21∗=p2E_{21}E_{21}^*=p_2, and both projections are fixed, ut∗ut=utut∗=1u_t^*u_t=u_tu_t^*=1. The path is strongly* continuous, and u0=1u_0=1.

The matrix identity E21(xE11)E12=xE22E_{21}(xE_{11})E_{12}=xE_{22}, after applying σtΘ\sigma_t^\Theta and using (BC14), proves

σtψ(x)=utσtφ(x)ut∗(x∈M).(BC19)\sigma_t^\psi(x)=u_t\sigma_t^\varphi(x)u_t^* \qquad(x\in M). \tag{BC19}

The identity utE21=E21(utE11)u_tE_{21}=E_{21}(u_tE_{11}) and the group law give

us+tE21=σsΘ(E21)σsΘ(utE11)=usσsφ(ut)E21.u_{s+t}E_{21} =\sigma_s^\Theta(E_{21})\sigma_s^\Theta(u_tE_{11}) =u_s\sigma_s^\varphi(u_t)E_{21}.

Thus the full cocycle law is

us+t=usσsφ(ut)(s,t∈R).(BC20)u_{s+t}=u_s\sigma_s^\varphi(u_t)\qquad(s,t\in\mathbb R). \tag{BC20}

More generally βt2,1(x)=utσtφ(x)=σtψ(x)ut\beta_t^{2,1}(x)=u_t\sigma_t^\varphi(x)=\sigma_t^\psi(x)u_t, by factoring xE21xE_{21} through either diagonal corner.

For three weights φ,ψ,χ\varphi,\psi,\chi, use their balanced weight on M3(M)M_3(M). Its two-entry restrictions agree with the corresponding two-weight constructions by (BC13). Applying its modular automorphism to E31=E32E21E_{31}=E_{32}E_{21} gives the exact chain identity

(Dχ:Dφ)t=(Dχ:Dψ)t(Dψ:Dφ)t.(BC21)(D\chi:D\varphi)_t =(D\chi:D\psi)_t(D\psi:D\varphi)_t. \tag{BC21}

No commutation of the two factors is asserted.

For identical weights, every coordinate in (BC5) is a copy of HφH_\varphi. In (BC11), every initial relative graph is the original finite-star graph of SφS_\varphi; its closure is that complete operator. Thus SΘS_\Theta is transposition followed by SφS_\varphi in each coordinate, with the full finite orthogonal-sum graph domain. Its adjoint product is Δφ\Delta_\varphi on every coordinate, again with the full orthogonal-sum domain. Spectral calculus acts coordinatewise, so conjugating (BC6) by ΔΘit\Delta_\Theta^{it} is exactly the represented entrywise action X↦(σtφ(xij))X\mapsto(\sigma_t^\varphi(x_{ij})). Faithfulness identifies this with σΘ\sigma^\Theta. It fixes all scalar matrix units, and hence

(Dφ:Dφ)t=1.(BC22)(D\varphi:D\varphi)_t=1. \tag{BC22}

The chain law with χ=φ\chi=\varphi and unitarity now yield

(Dφ:Dψ)t=(Dψ:Dφ)t∗.(BC23)(D\varphi:D\psi)_t=(D\psi:D\varphi)_t^*. \tag{BC23}

BC-5. Scalar factors and covariance under isomorphisms

For positive constants c1,…,ckc_1,\ldots,c_k and a single faithful normal semifinite weight φ\varphi, identify HcjφH_{c_j\varphi} with HφH_\varphi by Λcjφ(x)↦cjΛφ(x)\Lambda_{c_j\varphi}(x)\mapsto\sqrt{c_j}\Lambda_\varphi(x). In these coordinates, the component (i,j)(i,j) of SΘS_\Theta is sent to component (j,i)(j,i) as

ξ⟼cicjSφξ,ξ∈D(Sφ).\xi\longmapsto\sqrt{\frac{c_i}{c_j}}S_\varphi\xi, \qquad \xi\in D(S_\varphi).

The complete domain follows from (BC11), since all the finite ideals and initial star domains are unchanged by a positive scalar. Its adjoint product is therefore

Δi,j=cicjΔφ\Delta_{i,j}=\frac{c_i}{c_j}\Delta_\varphi

with the exact scalar-rescaled spectral domains. Formula (BC17) or direct row multiplication gives

σtΘ(Eij)=(ci/cj)itEij,(D(cφ):Dφ)t=cit1(c>0).(BC24)\sigma_t^\Theta(E_{ij})=(c_i/c_j)^{it}E_{ij},\qquad (D(c\varphi):D\varphi)_t=c^{it}1\quad(c>0). \tag{BC24}

In particular equal modular automorphism groups alone do not determine these scalar cocycles; their balanced-weight definition retains the weight normalization.

Finally let γ:M→L\gamma:M\to L be a normal *-isomorphism with normal inverse, and put φ~j=φj∘γ−1\widetilde\varphi_j=\varphi_j\circ\gamma^{-1}. The entrywise normal isomorphism γk:Mk(M)→Mk(L)\gamma_k:M_k(M)\to M_k(L) transports the whole balanced weight, including infinite values: Θ~(γk(X))=Θ(X)\widetilde\Theta(\gamma_k(X))=\Theta(X) for every positive XX. It maps each full finite ideal and each finite-star domain bijectively, by (BC2)–3. The GNS map

UΛΘ(X)=ΛΘ~(γk(X))(X∈NΘ)(BC-GRAPH3) U\Lambda_\Theta(X)=\Lambda_{\widetilde\Theta}(\gamma_k(X)) \qquad(X\in N_\Theta) \tag{BC-GRAPH3}

is isometric, extends onto the full GNS space, and intertwines the represented matrix algebras. On the entire finite-star domains it intertwines the initial involutions in both directions. Taking graph closures therefore gives equality of the complete closed involutions; conjugate-linear adjoints and their products give UΔΘU∗=ΔΘ~U\Delta_\Theta U^*=\Delta_{\widetilde\Theta}, with the full domains. Unitary spectral calculus transports every imaginary power. Comparing the two faithful implemented modular groups now proves γk(σtΘ(X))=σtΘ~(γk(X))\gamma_k(\sigma_t^\Theta(X))=\sigma_t^{\widetilde\Theta}(\gamma_k(X)) for every X∈Mk(M)X\in M_k(M). Since γk(E21)=E21\gamma_k(E_{21})=E_{21}, the balanced definition (BC18) yields

(Dψ~:Dφ~)t=γ((Dψ:Dφ)t).(BC25)(D\widetilde\psi:D\widetilde\varphi)_t =\gamma((D\psi:D\varphi)_t). \tag{BC25}

The conclusions here include full arbitrary faithful n.s.f. weight scope, all finite matrix domains, relative closed graph parts, modular corner identification, the cocycle, adjoint and chain identities, positive scalar normalization and normal-isomorphism covariance. They do not prove spatial-derivative correspondence, arbitrary-cocycle realization, nonfaithful cocycle extensions, natural-cone standard form, the general sum decomposition of normal weights, or operator-valued weights.