Open MathsAll courses
Positive maps and finite-dimensional approximation · Prerequisite proofs · Sources and terms

Scalar GNS and matrix C∗-norms

Let AA be any complex C∗-algebra, including the zero algebra. No separability or nondegeneracy is assumed. We first construct representations from scalar order, then construct the matrix norms, and finally prove complete positivity and complete contractivity. Inner products here are linear in the second variable.

Our scalar inputs are choice and Hahn–Banach, continuous calculus, positivity and order, Hilbert space facts, forced unitization, and inner product completion. These are scalar proofs. They do not use a matrix C∗-norm or a dilation of a completely positive map. Their set-theoretic boundary is ordinary choice, and their analytic boundary is the real and complex scalar fields, completeness and elementary real calculus stated there.

The scalar order, representation and matrix positivity constructions, with exact bounds.

The arrows record the order of the proofs below. The first three steps use scalar positivity only. The matrix square root is taken after the matrix algebra has been proved complete with a C∗-norm. This order applies to arbitrary AA; the extra scalar summand in its forced unitization also handles A=0A=0.

MG01. Positive extensions and norming states

Let C≠0C\ne0 be a unital C∗-algebra. Let E⊂CsaE\subset C_{\rm sa} be a real linear subspace containing 11, and let f:E→Rf:E\to\mathbb R be positive for the inherited order. Write r=f(1)≥0r=f(1)\ge0. For x∈Csax\in C_{\rm sa}, set

p(x)=inf⁡{f(y):y∈E, y≥x}.p(x)=\inf\{f(y):y\in E,\ y\ge x\}.

This is finite: ∥x∥1\|x\|1 is an allowed majorant, and every allowed yy satisfies y+∥x∥1≥0y+\|x\|1\ge0, whence f(y)≥−r∥x∥f(y)\ge-r\|x\|. Sums of majorants prove subadditivity, and scaling majorants proves positive homogeneity; also p(0)=0p(0)=0. If x∈Ex\in E, positivity gives f(y)≥f(x)f(y)\ge f(x) for every allowed yy, while y=xy=x gives equality. Thus p∣E=fp|_E=f.

Real Hahn–Banach gives a real linear extension g≤pg\le p. If x≥0x\ge0, the majorant 0≥−x0\ge-x gives g(−x)≤p(−x)≤0g(-x)\le p(-x)\le0, so g(x)≥0g(x)\ge0. Complexify by

G(a)=g ⁣(a+a∗2)+i g ⁣(a−a∗2i).G(a)=g\!\left(\frac{a+a^*}{2}\right)+i\,g\!\left(\frac{a-a^*}{2i}\right).

Then GG is complex linear, positive, satisfies G(a∗)=G(a)‾G(a^*)=\overline{G(a)}, and G(1)=rG(1)=r. For any a,b∈Ca,b\in C, positivity of (a+tb)∗(a+tb)(a+tb)^*(a+tb), for t∈Ct\in\mathbb C, gives

0≤G(a∗a)+2Re⁡(tG(a∗b))+∣t∣2G(b∗b).0\le G(a^*a)+2\operatorname{Re}(tG(a^*b))+|t|^2G(b^*b).

If G(b∗b)>0G(b^*b)>0, choose t=−G(a∗b)‾/G(b∗b)t=-\overline{G(a^*b)}/G(b^*b); if it is zero, varying the phase and magnitude of tt forces G(a∗b)=0G(a^*b)=0. Hence

∣G(a∗b)∣2≤G(a∗a)G(b∗b),∣G(a)∣2≤rG(a∗a)≤r2∥a∥2.|G(a^*b)|^2\le G(a^*a)G(b^*b),\qquad |G(a)|^2\le rG(a^*a)\le r^2\|a\|^2.

The last inequality uses the scalar order bound a∗a≤∥a∥21a^*a\le\|a\|^2 1. Thus ∥G∥=r\|G\|=r, including r=0r=0. No matrix positivity entered this extension or its norm estimate.

For h≥0h\ge0, h≠0h\ne0, scalar calculus identifies C∗(1,h)C^*(1,h) with continuous functions on σ(h)\sigma(h). The spectral point ∥h∥\|h\| exists because the spectrum is compact, nonnegative and has maximum equal to the norm. Evaluation there is a positive functional of value one on the unit. Applying the preceding extension to its real self-adjoint part produces a state ss on CC with s(h)=∥h∥s(h)=\|h\|. States exist even when h=0h=0: extend f(t1)=tf(t1)=t on R1\mathbb R1. The assertion is for the unital algebra CC; it does not assert that every spectral value of an element of a nonunital algebra is attained by a state of that algebra.

MG02. A representation from a scalar state

Let ss be a state of CC. On CC, put ⟨a,b⟩s=s(a∗b)\langle a,b\rangle_s=s(a^*b), and let N={a:s(a∗a)=0}N=\{a:s(a^*a)=0\}. The scalar Cauchy–Schwarz inequality just proved makes every null vector orthogonal to every vector. Therefore the form descends to an inner product on C/NC/N; it also shows that NN is a linear subspace. Complete this inner product space to HsH_s.

Scalar positivity of ∥c∥21−c∗c\|c\|^2 1-c^*c and its congruence by aa gives

s(a∗c∗ca)≤∥c∥2s(a∗a).s(a^*c^*ca)\le\|c\|^2s(a^*a).

Consequently NN is a left ideal. The rule πs(c)[a]=[ca]\pi_s(c)[a]=[ca] is well defined and bounded by ∥c∥\|c\|, and extends uniquely to HsH_s. Products and the unit agree on the dense quotient and hence on its completion. The identity

⟨πs(c)[a],[b]⟩s=s(a∗c∗b)=⟨[a],πs(c∗)[b]⟩s\langle\pi_s(c)[a],[b]\rangle_s=s(a^*c^*b) =\langle[a],\pi_s(c^*)[b]\rangle_s

gives πs(c)∗=πs(c∗)\pi_s(c)^*=\pi_s(c^*). Thus πs\pi_s is a unital ∗-representation, and ξs=[1]\xi_s=[1] is a unit vector with dense cyclic span and

s(c)=⟨ξs,πs(c)ξs⟩s.s(c)=\langle\xi_s,\pi_s(c)\xi_s\rangle_s.

If ρ\rho with cyclic unit vector η\eta gives the same state, [a]↦ρ(a)η[a]\mapsto\rho(a)\eta preserves this inner product and is well defined on the quotient. It extends to an isometry with dense range, hence to a unitary, and the identity on quotient vectors shows that it intertwines the representations. This proves the entire scalar construction and its uniqueness. Compare Peterson, Theorem 2.3.6, pages 31–32, with the inner product convention converted here. We have not used a matrix algebra or the assertion that scalar positive maps are completely positive.

MG03. Faithful isometric representations at arbitrary cardinality

Use the forced unitization C=A†=A⊕CC=A^\dagger=A\oplus\mathbb C, whose scalar construction and norm are proved in the cited unitization section. This algebra is nonzero and unital even when A=0A=0, or when AA already has a unit. Its set S(C)S(C) of states is a subset of the set CC\mathbb C^C. Form the algebraic Hilbert direct sum of the HsH_s, s∈S(C)s\in S(C), and complete it. The coordinate actions πs(c)\pi_s(c), each bounded by ∥c∥\|c\|, give a bounded unital ∗-representation Γ(c)\Gamma(c) on this completion. This construction places no countability restriction on S(C)S(C) or on the Hilbert space.

For c≠0c\ne0, MG01 gives a state with s(c∗c)=∥c∥2s(c^*c)=\|c\|^2. Testing on the unit vector in this summand yields

∥Γ(c)∥≥∥πs(c)ξs∥=s(c∗c)1/2=∥c∥.\|\Gamma(c)\|\ge\|\pi_s(c)\xi_s\| =s(c^*c)^{1/2}=\|c\|.

The reverse bound holds on every finite-support vector and then on its completion. Hence Γ\Gamma is isometric and faithful. Its restriction to AA is also isometric and faithful; for A=0A=0 this is the zero algebra acting on the same Hilbert space. Compare Peterson, Corollary 2.3.7, page 32.

We will also need isometry for any faithful representation. First let θ:C→D\theta:C\to D be an injective unital algebraic ∗-homomorphism of unital C∗-algebras. It is contractive by scalar spectral inclusion: invertibility of x−λ1x-\lambda1 implies invertibility of θ(x)−λ1\theta(x)-\lambda1, so

∥θ(c)∥2=rD(θ(c∗c))≤rC(c∗c)=∥c∥2.\|\theta(c)\|^2=r_D(\theta(c^*c))\le r_C(c^*c)=\|c\|^2.

Uniform ∗-polynomial approximation and contractivity imply θ(f(h))=f(θ(h))\theta(f(h))=f(\theta(h)) for self-adjoint hh and continuous ff on its spectrum, restricted to the image spectrum. If θ(h)≥0\theta(h)\ge0, apply this to h−h_-, the negative-part function: θ(h−)=0\theta(h_-)=0. Injectivity gives h−=0h_-=0, hence h≥0h\ge0. Thus θ\theta reflects scalar order. Reflecting θ(c∗c)≤∥θ(c)∥21\theta(c^*c)\le\|\theta(c)\|^2 1 gives ∥c∥≤∥θ(c)∥\|c\|\le\|\theta(c)\|, and therefore isometry. This argument does not assume the image is closed.

For a faithful, possibly degenerate representation ρ:A→B(K)\rho:A\to B(K), the extension

ρ†(a,λ)=(ρ(a)+λIK)⊕λon K⊕C\rho^\dagger(a,\lambda) =(\rho(a)+\lambda I_K)\oplus\lambda\quad\hbox{on }K\oplus\mathbb C

is an injective unital algebraic ∗-homomorphism. The scalar summand first forces λ=0\lambda=0 in its kernel, then faithfulness forces a=0a=0. The preceding proof applies, so its restriction ρ\rho is isometric. It also covers K=0K=0 when A=0A=0.

MG04. Construction and uniqueness of the matrix norm

For n≥1n\ge1, represent the algebraic matrix P=[aij]∈Mn(A)P=[a_{ij}]\in M_n(A) on HnH^n by [Γ(aij)][\Gamma(a_{ij})], where Γ∣A\Gamma|_A is the faithful representation above. Define ∥P∥\|P\| to be its operator norm. Coordinate inclusions and projections are contractions, and the representation of each entry is isometric. Consequently

max⁡i,j∥aij∥≤∥P∥≤∑i,j∥aij∥.\max_{i,j}\|a_{ij}\|\le\|P\|\le\sum_{i,j}\|a_{ij}\|.

The lower bound follows by compressing to one entry. For the upper bound, write the operator as the finite sum of its coordinate inclusions, entry actions and coordinate projections. Matrix multiplication and adjoints agree with their entry formulas. The lower bound makes this representation injective. If matrices are Cauchy, each entry is Cauchy in AA; the limits give a matrix, and the upper bound proves convergence to it in operator norm. The image is therefore a closed ∗-subalgebra of B(Hn)B(H^n). The Hilbert operator C∗-identity gives ∥P∗P∥=∥P∥2\|P^*P\|=\|P\|^2. Thus this is a complete C∗-norm, also for the zero matrix algebra.

Now use any other faithful representation ρ:A→B(K)\rho:A\to B(K). MG03 makes it isometric, so the same entry bounds make its matrix image a complete C∗-algebra. The entrywise identification between the two images is an algebraic ∗-isomorphism. Extend it and its inverse to their forced unitizations. Both extensions are unital ∗-homomorphisms and hence contractive by the scalar argument in MG03. Restriction proves that the two matrix norms are equal. This works when AA already has a unit and either representation is degenerate: the intrinsic unit of the matrix image is the diagonal image of 1A1_A, rather than an assumed identity on the entire Hilbert space. It also works when AA has no unit. We have therefore constructed the canonical C∗-norm of Mn(A)M_n(A) without a tensor norm theorem, a completely positive dilation or an assumed matrix norm.

MG05. Positive functionals are bounded and completely positive

Let f:A→Cf:A\to\mathbb C be a complex linear functional that is nonnegative on the scalar positive cone. We first prove boundedness without assuming continuity. If its values on the positive unit ball were unbounded, for each m≥1m\ge1 we could choose am≥0a_m\ge0 with ∥am∥≤2−m\|a_m\|\le2^{-m} and f(am)≥mf(a_m)\ge m. Completeness gives a=∑mam∈Aa=\sum_m a_m\in A. The cone is closed under norm limits and addition, so a−am≥0a-a_m\ge0 for each mm. Thus f(a)≥f(am)≥mf(a)\ge f(a_m)\ge m for every mm, a contradiction. This uses order domination by the sum, without moving ff through an infinite sum.

Hence K=sup⁡{f(b):b≥0, ∥b∥≤1}<∞K=\sup\{f(b):b\ge0,\ \|b\|\le1\}<\infty. Scalar positive and negative parts decompose each self-adjoint element into two positive elements of norm at most its norm. Decomposing real and imaginary parts similarly gives ∣f(x)∣≤4K∥x∥|f(x)|\le4K\|x\|, since both parts have norm at most ∥x∥\|x\|. It also shows that ff is real on self-adjoint elements and satisfies f(x∗)=f(x)‾f(x^*)=\overline{f(x)}. For the zero algebra these conclusions hold with K=0K=0.

We can now use MG04. Scalar calculus in the complete C∗-algebra Mn(A)M_n(A), including the vanishing-at-zero calculus for a nonunital algebra, shows that each P≥0P\ge0 has a square root R=P1/2∈Mn(A)R=P^{1/2}\in M_n(A) and P=R∗RP=R^*R. For λ∈Cn\lambda\in\mathbb C^n, put yi=∑jRijλj∈Ay_i=\sum_j R_{ij}\lambda_j\in A. Entry multiplication gives

∑j,kλj‾Pjkλk=∑iyi∗yi≥0,∑j,kλj‾f(Pjk)λk=f ⁣(∑iyi∗yi)≥0.\sum_{j,k}\overline{\lambda_j}P_{jk}\lambda_k =\sum_i y_i^*y_i\ge0, \qquad \sum_{j,k}\overline{\lambda_j}f(P_{jk})\lambda_k =f\!\left(\sum_i y_i^*y_i\right)\ge0.

The scalar matrix [f(Pjk)][f(P_{jk})] is Hermitian and has a nonnegative quadratic form, so the Hilbert positive-operator criterion makes it positive in Mn(C)M_n(\mathbb C). Its norm and order coincide with those of B(Cn)B(\mathbb C^n) by the norm independence in MG04, using the faithful scalar representation on C\mathbb C. This proves positivity of every amplification fnf_n, which is complete positivity. Matrix square roots enter only after the scalar GNS and matrix norm constructions are complete.

MG06. Complete contractivity and complete isometry of ∗-homomorphisms

Let ϕ:A→D\phi:A\to D be any algebraic ∗-homomorphism of C∗-algebras. Its entrywise map ϕn:Mn(A)→Mn(D)\phi_n:M_n(A)\to M_n(D) is an algebraic ∗-homomorphism of the C∗-algebras just constructed. Extend it to the forced unitizations by (P,λ)↦(ϕn(P),λ)(P,\lambda)\mapsto(\phi_n(P),\lambda). This extension is unital, so the scalar spectral-inclusion proof in MG03 gives ∥ϕn(P)∥≤∥P∥\|\phi_n(P)\|\le\|P\|. This holds for every nn, proving complete contractivity, with no unitality or nondegeneracy restriction on ϕ\phi.

If ϕ\phi is injective, ϕn\phi_n is injective entry by entry. Its forced-unitization extension is injective because the scalar coordinate forces λ=0\lambda=0 first. The order-reflection argument of MG03 then makes every amplification isometric. Thus every injective ∗-homomorphism is completely isometric. Positivity also follows directly: P=R∗RP=R^*R implies ϕn(P)=ϕn(R)∗ϕn(R)≥0\phi_n(P)=\phi_n(R)^*\phi_n(R)\ge0. These assertions include the zero domain.

Sources and terms

Peterson's 2015 operator-algebra notes, Theorem 2.3.6 and Corollary 2.3.7, pages 31–32, supply the freely readable scalar GNS and faithful-sum comparison. The positive-extension argument, arbitrary-cardinality and forced-unitization cases, norm reflection, matrix construction and noncircular boundedness proof are written explicitly above using the linked scalar foundations. Shirbisheh's Lectures on C∗-algebras, arXiv 1211.3404v2, draft dated 13 October 2021, provides scalar-calculus comparisons: Theorems 3.1.34 and 3.2.4, Proposition 3.2.9 and Proposition 4.1.8. Its omitted or referred-out antecedents are supplied by the linked scalar proofs rather than assumed here.

This exposition and the diagram are original course contributions by GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI), Ultra, released under CC0-1.0. The linked human works retain their own terms; no licence for their text is transferred by these links.